Which types of projects would be best avoided according to an evaluation of systems and IT projects?

Focusing on projects that are labeled as high-risk and low-benefit is crucial for making wise decisions in resource allocation and project management. High-risk projects involve significant uncertainties that can lead to failure or underperformance. If these projects also have a low benefit, meaning they do not promise sufficient returns on investment or strategic value, taking them on can waste resources and detract from more promising endeavors.

Avoiding such projects allows organizations to mitigate exposure to potential losses while ensuring that resources are directed toward projects that are either low-risk or high-benefit or ideally both. This strategic decision-making is essential for maintaining an efficient, cost-effective portfolio of projects that can deliver value and align with broader organizational goals.

In the context of the other options, high-risk projects may sometimes be justified if they promise high rewards or benefits, and low-benefit projects could still be necessary depending on specific organizational needs or requirements. However, combining high risk with low benefit represents a particularly unfavorable position and is generally advised against.