Which systems are considered shareable on a transnational basis in terms of cost and feasibility?

The correct answer highlights that only systems that support functions critical to the organization are considered shareable on a transnational basis regarding cost and feasibility. This emphasis on critical functions is essential because these systems typically align closely with the overall strategic objectives of a multinational organization. When systems support core operational needs, they are more likely to provide a good return on investment when shared across countries. They must also be adaptable to various regulatory, cultural, and market conditions encountered in different regions.

Core systems generally include enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems, supply chain management, and customer relationship management systems—all essential for managing operations on a global scale. By focusing on critical functions, the organization ensures that the systems in question can enhance performance across various locations, ensuring coherence and efficiency in processes.

In contrast, options that include only provincial systems or those not essential to organizational functions may not provide the same level of return or may face higher integration challenges across diverse geographic market conditions. Systems that are not critical are less likely to yield the necessary benefits to justify sharing them on a transnational basis. These considerations are crucial in making informed decisions about system investments and deployments in multinational contexts.