What rollout approach is suitable for a large company with multiple interdependencies in its ERP implementation?

The phased approach is particularly suitable for a large company with multiple interdependencies during its ERP implementation because it allows the organization to implement the system in manageable segments or phases rather than all at once. This method helps in addressing complexities incrementally, which is crucial when different departments or functions are closely interrelated.

By rolling out the ERP system in phases, the company can focus on implementing one part of the system while still relying on legacy systems for other areas. This minimizes disruption to ongoing processes and reduces the risk associated with a full-system switch, which can be overwhelming for employees and potentially lead to significant operational challenges.

Additionally, the phased approach enables the organization to learn from each implementation phase, allowing for adjustments and refinements based on feedback and performance metrics before moving on to subsequent phases. This continuous improvement helps ensure that the entire ERP system is effectively tailored to meet the company’s specific needs.

The other approaches may not be as well-suited for an organization with multiple dependencies. The big bang approach involves implementing the entire ERP system at once, which can be risky and lead to substantial operational disruption, especially in a complex environment. The hybrid approach, while flexible, may complicate integration efforts as it combines different strategies. The waterfall approach is linear and may not