The criteria used for evaluation in a scoring model are usually determined by:

The criteria used for evaluation in a scoring model are typically determined by lengthy discussions among the decision-making group. This process involves gathering insights and perspectives from various stakeholders, ensuring that all relevant voices are heard. The decision-making group, which may include project sponsors, management, and key users, engages in comprehensive discussions to identify what factors are most important for the project’s success.

This collaborative approach helps to ensure that the evaluation criteria reflect the goals and priorities of the organization, aligning them with strategic objectives. By doing so, the scoring model becomes a more effective tool for assessing options, as it is rooted in well-rounded considerations from a variety of relevant perspectives.

Other options like CSF analysis, the IS steering committee, or systems analysts, while contributing to the overall context of decision-making, do not singularly reflect the comprehensive approach represented by lengthy discussions among the decision-making group. These entities may provide valuable input, but the collective discussion is critical for establishing a shared understanding and consensus on the evaluation criteria.